Random Topics from the Past Week or Two
This past week, there have been several topics that have come up that I wanted to discuss but haven’t had the chance to. In this post, I will discuss several topics that have emerged in the past few weeks.
Blake
Griffin Buyout
On March 5th, the Detroit Pistons officially
bought out Blake Griffin after being unable to find a trade partner. This did not surprise me given he was owed
more than $75M for this year and next year, has struggled mightily, and doesn’t
make sense with the rebuilding Pistons. ESPN has reported that the sides agreed to a reduced payment for the buyout, which isn’t
too surprising that they were able to find common ground. Bleacher Report said that Shams Charania
reports that the Nets are expected to be a favorite, while Adrian Wojnarowski
reported that the Warriors, Heat, and Trail Blazers are interested in him. I have also heard the Lakers, Clippers, and
Bucks thrown in as possibilities; I could also see the Celtics, Hornets, and
Wizards reaching out about him as well.
That said, the Nets make the most sense for him as a small 5 off the
bench where he can be a lead playmaker anytime Kevin Durant, James Harden, or
Kyrie Irving are off the court; he also could fit offensively in select doses,
but that could cause issues defensively.
All Star Mike
Conley
We can no longer say that Mike Conley is the best player to
never be named an All-Star, as Adam Silver has named Conley a replacement for
the recently injured Devin Booker (who was replacing Anthony Davis). He is averaging 16.1 PPG with a 42.2% 3P% and
55.5 eFG%, 5.7 APG, 3.5 RPG, and 1.4 SPG for the 27-9 Jazz, who hold the best
record in the NBA. Several advanced
statistics have viewed him favorably as well, as he is 17th in WS/48
(0.194) and 24th in BPM (3.9).
While I would have chosen DeMar DeRozan over him, I am glad to see Conley
finally named an All-Star after being stuck behind several other stars for
years.
Lloyd
Pierce Firing
On March 1st, the Atlanta Hawks fired head coach
Lloyd Pierce and named Nate McMillan their interim head coach. While I’m uncertain McMillan will be successful
this season with the team, I am disappointed that Pierce was fired. He didn’t get the chance to truly utilize
most of the new acquisitions, as Bogdan Bogdanovic, Kris Dunn, Rajon Rondo, and
Onyeka Okongwu all dealt with injuries.
On top of that, break out player De’Andre Hunter got hurt right as the
team skidded, as he got injured in game 19, when the team was 10-9; when Pierce
was fired, the team was 14-20. I think
there are two factors contributing to his firing: lack of support from the roster and pressure
from management. I expect that after giving
up Luka Doncic in exchange for Trae Young (who has been inconsistent this year
and still hasn’t shown he can be the star of a winning team) and Cam Reddish
(who has struggled with his shot), General Manager Travis Schlenk likely has a
shorter leash if the team misses the play-in game. The Sacramento Kings already parted ways with
Vlade Divac (likely after choosing Marvin Bagley III over Luka Doncic, a move
that seemed like it was clearly a bad choice at the time even), so it wouldn’t
surprise me if something similar happens by the end of this year. I hope Pierce gets another job; I think he will
be better with a team that, even if younger, is more mature.
All-Star Draft
The All-Star Draft occurred on March 4th, where
captains LeBron James and Kevin Durant selected their teams for the All-Star Game. James had the first pick of the starters
since he finished first in the fan voting, while Durant had the first pick of
the reserves. Since Durant will miss the
game due to injury, he had the 8th and 9th selections of
the draft. The selections follow:
- Giannis Antetokounmpo (LeBron)
- Kyle Irving (Durant)
- Stephen Curry (LeBron)
- Joel Embiid (Durant)
- Luka Doncic (LeBron)
- Kawhi Leonard (Durant)
- Nikola Jokic (LeBron)
- Bradley Beal (Durant)
- Jayson Tatum (Durant)
- James Harden (Durant)
- Damian Lillard (LeBron)
- Devin Booker (Durant) (will be replaced by Mike Conley)
- Ben Simmons (LeBron)
- Zion Williamson (Durant)
- Chris Paul (LeBron)
- Zach LaVine (Durant)
- Jaylen Brown (LeBron)
- Julius Randle (Durant)
- Paul George (LeBron)
- Nikola Vucevic (Durant)
- Domantas Sabonis (Lebron)
- Donovan Michell (Durant)
- Rudy Gobert (LeBron)
LeBron
James/Zlatan
In the last couple weeks, soccer superstar Zlatan Ibrahimovic criticized LeBron James’ activism in particular (while criticizing athletes’ activism as a whole) with multiple statements. He first said that "athletes unite the world, politics divide it. Our role is to unite the world by doing what we do best. Athletes should be athletes and politicians should do politics." He also said the following:
"[LeBron] is phenomenal at
what he's doing, but I don't like when people have some kind of status, they go
and do politics at the same time. Do
what you're good at. Do the category you do. I play football because I'm the
best at playing football. I don't do
politics. If I would be a political politician, I would do politics. That is
the first mistake people do when they become famous and they become in a
certain status. Stay out of it. Just do what you do best, because it doesn't
look good."
With all of this, I agree with LeBron for a few
reasons. From a logic standpoint, Zlatan’s
argument of effectively sticking to sports (which is common in today’s society)
is a blatant case of a fallacious ad hominem, in which one individual attacks an
individual making a claim and uses that as for why their point should be
ignored. In the “stick to sports” or “shut
up and dribble” type of arguments, they are attacking by claiming the person
should be ignored because they are not an expert and are not entitled to
opinions regarding a matter. This exact
fallacy is frequently used in politics by people in both parties, especially
with celebrities (think back to when the band now known as The Chicks were
criticized for bashing George Bush or the backlash Kid Rock faced for criticizing
Barack Obama). The best way to combat
this logically incorrect way of an argument would be to say something along the
lines of “attack the opinion, not the individual” since the point of arguing is
arguing a point and not the person, but people either get offended by that and resort
to name calling or don’t understand this concept. This argument is only used when people disagree
with the point; while there is a difference in favoring the opinion of an
expert (being careful not to fall into another fallacy though), using this is
often used when somebody disagrees with the point and doesn’t want to (or is
unable to) fight it.
The reason I agree with LeBron conceptually is twofold. First off, people are entitled to have
opinions and beliefs. To tell someone
they cannot fight for their beliefs is juvenile, irresponsible, and, in the
case of Zlatan, arguably hypocritical whenever they opt to do anything other
than doing what the said person is an “expert” at (in the case of Zlatan,
people might view it as hypocritical if he does anything other than playing soccer,
which is ridiculous but is a consequence of making a statement so
ridiculous). The other reason I disagree
with Zlatan is the impact historically that athletes have had in fighting for
what they believe. Some notable examples
in the U.S. include Mohammad Ali, Tommie Smith and John Carlos, Bill Russell, Jackie
Robinson, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Colin Kaepernick, Kathy Switzer, Jim Brown, John
Thompson, Arthur Asche, and the U.S. Women’s National Soccer Team. In the past election, the WNBA and NBA both
played a major role in getting people registered to vote; the WNBA played a
major role in then Atlanta Dream owner Kelly Loeffler’s defeat in her senate
race after she criticized the league’s support for Black Lives Matter, with
Dream players wearing shirts saying “Vote Warnock”, endorsing her opponent. The power and influence somebody in a
position of public attention is remarkable, and it makes sense to discuss their
beliefs. Just as I think it is good for people
to have hobbies outside of their career, I think it is good for people to have
beliefs despite not being a go-to source of information related this. Just because LeBron James is not a politician
does not mean it is illegal for him to share his opinions on beliefs.
Zlatan, it’s okay to disagree with what somebody says; there
will never be a person who you agree with everything they say and believe. However, when that happens, rather than
dismissing the person, discuss the argument.
If you don’t want to discuss the argument, don’t feel comfortable with
the information you have, or don’t have an opinion, that’s okay too; you don’t
have to discuss your beliefs if for whatever reason you would prefer not
to. That said, it is illogical to assume
that others should follow the same mindset when they feel comfortable discussing
it, especially after having been asked about it.
What do you think about these topics? Was there anything that interested you in the last couple weeks? Let me know in the comments!
Comments
Post a Comment